LIVING-DINING-KITCHEN (LDK) DESIGN IN INDONESIAN TINY HOUSE BY ACTIVITY TYPOLOGY AND SPATIAL ORGANIZATION ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v10i3.4432Kata Kunci:
tiny house, living-dining-kitchen (LDK), preferensi pengguna milenial, organisasi ruang, Indonesia.Abstrak
Konsep Tiny House (TH) muncul sebagai salah satu solusi terhadap keterbatasan hunian perkotaan di Indonesia. Namun, perancangan ruang yang mampu mengakomodasi kebutuhan aktivitas penghuninya masih menjadi tantangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi kombinasi ruang esensial pada Tiny House di Indonesia berdasarkan preferensi pengguna milenial (Millennial User Preferences/MUP) serta merumuskan tata letak Living–Dining–Kitchen (LDK) yang optimal melalui analisis tipologi aktivitas dan organisasi ruang. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yang mengombinasikan studi literatur, analisis konten media sosial, dan kuesioner daring terhadap lebih dari 300 responden milenial di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa LDK merupakan kombinasi ruang esensial yang paling dominan karena mampu mewadahi aktivitas utama seperti memasak, makan, berkumpul bersama keluarga, dan aktivitas rekreasi. Analisis organisasi ruang menunjukkan bahwa tata letak LDK yang optimal memerlukan persentase area sirkulasi minimum sebesar 60%, dengan luasan furnitur efektif sekitar 7,16 m² pada total luas ruang 17,92 m². Meskipun tata letak dengan sirkulasi lebih rendah lebih disukai pengguna karena konfigurasi dapur yang kompak, penyesuaian dimensi dan penataan furnitur diperlukan untuk menjaga efisiensi fungsi dan kenyamanan psikologis. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi pada pengembangan desain Tiny House berbasis pengguna di Indonesia.Referensi
Analisa, F. C. K., & Okada, S. (2023). Tiny house characteristics in Indonesia based on millennial’s user preference. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2023.2166095
Becker, J. (2018). The minimalist home : a room-by-room guide to a decluttered, refocused life (1st ed.). WaterBrook, an imprint of the Crown Publishing Group, a division of Penguin Random House LLC.
Brand, S. (1995). How buildings learn : what happens after they’re built. Penguin Books.
Carlin, T. M. (2014). Tiny homes: Improving carbon footprint and the American lifestyle on a large scale. Celebrating Scholarship & Creativity Day, 21. https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/elce_cscday%0Ahttp://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/elce_cscdayhttp://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/elce_cscday/35
Maharjan, R. (2020). Low Cost, Tiny House.
De Chiara, J., & Callender, J. H. (1983). Time-saver standards for building types. McGraw-Hill International Book.
Estaji, H. (2017). A Review of Flexibility and Adaptability in Housing Design. International Journal of Contemporary Architecture, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.14621/tna.20170204
Geraedts, R., & Geraedts, R. P. (2008). Design for Change; Flexibility Key Performance Indicators. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236242179
Goessler, T., & Kaluarachchi, Y. (2023). Smart Adaptive Homes and Their Potential to Improve Space Efficiency and Personalisation. In Buildings (Vol. 13, Issue 5). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051132
Hutchinson, D. (2016). Struggling for Spatial Authenticity: An Analysis of the Tiny House Movement.
Kim, R. (2006). The “Art of Building” (Baukunst) of Mies Van Der Rohe.
Murphy, M. (2014). Tiny Houses as Appropriate Technology. Fellowship for Intentional Community, 165, 54–59. https://tinyhomeliving.weebly.com/research-blog/tiny-houses-as-appropriate-technology-mary-murphy
Mutter, A. (2013). Growing Tiny Houses Motivations and Opportunities for Expansion Through Niche Markets.
Raviz, S. R. H., Eteghad, A. N., Guardiola, E. U., & Aira, A. A. (2015). Flexible housing: The role of spatial organization in achieving functional efficiency. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 9(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i2.422
Mitchell, R. (2010). Tiny Houses Techum | Tiny Houses. 1–21. http://www.tinyhousestechum.nl/tiny-houses-techum
Shearer, H., & Burton, P. (2019). Towards a Typology of Tiny Houses. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2018.1487879
Singh, A. S., Masuku, M., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). Sampling Techniques and Determination of Sample Size in Applied Statistics Research: An Overview Article in International Journal of Commerce and Management. http://ijecm.co.uk/
Susanto, D., Ningsih, T. A., Felly, R., Sari, A. P., & Primalaila, D. (2022). The Minimum Space Standard: Proposing New House Floorplan on Dwelling Activities in Greater Jakarta Region, Indonesia. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 10(1), 372–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2022.2093790
Wilson, A., & Wadham, H. (2023). (Tiny) spaces of hope: Reclaiming, maintaining, and reframing housing in the tiny house movement. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 41(2), 330–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758231165295
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Jurnal Arsitektur ARCADE
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
