EVALUASI LEVEL OF SERVICE MELALUI KONFIGURASI SPASIAL BERBASIS SPACE SYNTAX PADA TERMINAL 3 DOMESTIK SOETTA

Authors

  • Dwinanto
  • Ramos Pasaribu
  • Posma Hutasoit

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v10i2.4577

Keywords:

Space Configuration, Level of Service, Passenger Circulation, Airport Terminal, Visibility Graph Analysis

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the relationship between spatial configuration and Level of Service (LoS) within the domestic terminal using the Space Syntax approach and IATA Airport Development Reference Manual (ADRM) 12th Edition. The research employed a quantitative-descriptive method through Visibility Graph Analysis (VGA) using DepthmapX to assess spatial integration, connectivity, and intelligibility across the main passenger processing areas, including check-in hall, security checkpoint, boarding lounge, baggage claim hall, and arrival hall. LoS evaluation was conducted based on peak hour passenger demand, queue capacity, processing time, and spatial capacity standards. The results indicate that the terminal has a strong linear spatial structure with high integration values along the main circulation corridors, supporting efficient passenger movement and orientation. However, several high-demand areas, particularly the check-in hall and baggage claim hall, still experience sub-optimum operational performance despite having adequate spatial capacity. The study concludes that effective terminal performance is influenced not only by spatial configuration but also by operational processing capacity and passenger flow distribution.

References

Arthur, P., & Passini, R. (1992). Wayfinding: People, signs, and architecture. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ashford, N., Stanton, H. P. M., Moore, C. A., Coutu, P., & Beasley, J. R. (2013). Airport operations (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

de Neufville, R., & Odoni, A. (2013). Airport systems: Planning, design, and management (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Golledge, R. G. (1999). Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Horonjeff, R., McKelvey, F. X., Sproule, W. J., & Young, S. B. (2010). Planning and design of airports (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Lawson, B. (2001). The language of space. Oxford: Architectural Press.

Hantari, A. N., & Ikaputra. (2020). The role of spatial configuration in wayfinding behavior at Yogyakarta International Airport. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 7(4), 89–98.

Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, 29–66.

Hoeven, F. van, & van Nes, A. (2014). Improving the design of urban underground space in metro stations using space syntax methodology. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 40, 64–74.

Kalakou, S., & Moura, F. (2014). Modelling passengers’ interactions and behavior in airport terminal buildings. Transportation Research Procedia, 3, 509–518.

Lee, S., & Seo, K. W. (2013). Combining space syntax with GIS-based built environment measures in pedestrian walking activity. Dalam Proceedings of the Ninth International Space Syntax Symposium. Seoul: Sejong University.

Mazareno, D. (2023). Analysis of walking distance efficiency and passenger circulation in Soekarno–Hatta Terminal 3 Airport. Journal of Infrastructure and Public Transportation, 7(1), 42–53.

Penn, A. (2003). Space syntax and spatial cognition. Environment and Behavior, 35, 30–65.

Syahrial, R., & Nusraningrum, D. (2022). Sustainability commitment at Soekarno–Hatta Airport through environmentally friendly technology. Journal of Environmental Management and Technology, 9(4), 89–102.

Turner, A. (2007). To move through space: Lines of vision and movement. Dalam Proceedings of the Sixth International Space Syntax Symposium. Istanbul: ITU.

Ueno, J., Nakazawa, A., & Kishimoto, T. (2009). Analysis of pedestrian movement in multilevel complex using space syntax theory: The case of Shibuya Station. Dalam Proceedings of the Seventh International Space Syntax Symposium. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.

International Air Transport Association (IATA). (2022). Airport development reference manual (12th ed.). Montreal: IATA.

International Organization for Standardization. (2019). ISO 9241-210:2019 ergonomics of human-system interaction—Human-centred design. Geneva: ISO.

Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor PM 41 Tahun 2023 tentang standar pelayanan penumpang bandar udara. Jakarta: Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia.

Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (2024). Statistik transportasi udara nasional 2023/2024. Jakarta: Badan Kebijakan Transportasi Udara.

PT Angkasa Pura II (InJourney Airports). (2024). Annual report 2023: Terminal 3 transformation program. Jakarta: PT Angkasa Pura II.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

EVALUASI LEVEL OF SERVICE MELALUI KONFIGURASI SPASIAL BERBASIS SPACE SYNTAX PADA TERMINAL 3 DOMESTIK SOETTA. (2026). Jurnal Arsitektur ARCADE, 10(2), 248-258. https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v10i2.4577